Please enter you credentials for Quantum Bell Communications




Click here to visit
Time Light Relativity.com,
A supporting project.
1|
Click here to visit
QuanTunnel.com,
A supporting project.
1|Point|1Click here to visit
Quantumbell.net,
A supporting project.
Click here to visit
Theory of Relativity.net,
A supporting project.
|1


Extensible ToR Modular



Theory of Relativity 2018: Modular

An American born perspective for a theory of relativity, the ToTLR (ToR) is celebrating more than 5 years online! Model, began unofficial development public prior to 2010, and made a first mention in 2012. ANd just keeps getting better as it is ammended!

A successful study of time, radio, and light will discover a natural perspective of Mass and RULE. +Michael

Visit technician.quantumbell.net for more details.

Ruler v1.3 Extensible; How to use the RULEr v1.3 to evaluate or validate extensible contributions. Place a mass in the center sphere, any mass, the ruler takes the shape of the mass and is then evaluated.
  • The RULER and from this the equation of observation, radio and light, specifically excluding other energies is not recommended at all, draw another ruler for the same mass, and too is a PMTM Model. This is a 2d or 3d first perspective observation.
  • There can be as many RULEr v1.3 in the same space as there are RL (Radio and Light) Models across a uline observation. Not mass same space, meaning two pieces of mass are not indicated in early model as in the space, comparable to two coffee cups in the same space with same type of mass and two volumes of coffee. Extensible concepts might show it is possible under some circumstance of application of energy and materials, to make such an observation true of two masses in the same space with a likely hood of success using the same material, like ceramic cofee cups. IUnder natural conditions on earth, that statement is made such that "".
  • The PMTM RULEr (Point Marker Transform Model) then has some point of any shape placed into the center sphere (1.). The center sphere takes the shape of whatever object is placed into it.
  • The Three larger circles (Markers) (the .3) also take the shape of the object and represent equal time distances from the point transform model between those marker and the PMTM placement. each ruler increment must be equal. I use increment 1 (could be any) for two dimensional and three dimensionals shape tranforms, of any designation (var; inch; mile; etc.). The distances must all be equal to the surface. The v over T, has the top of T / pplaced at the marler location of mass.
  • RULEr is referenced at Quantunnel Project
Ruler v1.3 Extensible; How to use the RULEr v1.3 and Reflection at Mass Time to validate an extensible contribution.
  • The V represents that position in time where light reflects or processed by the mass.
  • The T represent A (government or construction) mass at some time.
  • The Cross is resented for a short Period at Government of an Ark
Angle Extensible; How understand the perspective of light shining onto a PMTM, as part of RULE, and Evaluate across extensible contributions.
  • The central point is a point Mass casting a shadow or receiving shadow at distance observation among three points.
  • When looking at a lighted point, the shadow is general cast as smaller than the object as distance, relative to the distance of light emitting energy such that a shadow is cast is near by.
  • The Angle represent the government of shadow and interaction near a point.
  • The Angle is represented at the Government of an Archy or Archist.org
Angle Extensible; How understand the perspective of light shining onto a PMTM, as part of RULE, and Evaluate across extensible contributions.
  • The central point is a point Mass outputting light or receiving light at distance observation among three points.
  • The Angle represent the government of light and interaction near a point.
  • Points typically appear smaller at distance relative to the point of observation and myself, the legs of the compass indicate this characteristic for traversal of star maps or other local points requiring smaller observations and increments.
  • The Angle is represented at the Government of anArch or governmentofarch.net
RULE Extensible; How understand the construction of the RULE as a container equality as piece of observation for a uLINE.
  • The RULE is Radio, uLine, light = Energy.
  • RuL is single observation of row, that is part of the construction observable across a uLINE.
  • I can observe the RULE near any star in the local or distant universe.
  • When using mirror binary, the uLINE equivelancy it is single row observation, like the natural universe might appear to the eye of man. The types of energy observed, or named across the path.
  • See the RULE Sciences manual early edition planning.
uLINE Extensible; How understand the perspective of the uLINE as part of the PMTM across the construction of the RULE.
  • The uLine is a sequential order for data points across a known observation.
  • A u line, universe line, is a observable series of points, that might or might not contain the same observation of other mass. Mostly, it would be line drawn across some sequence of traversable or non traversable points. A line drawn between 1000 stars at my location, contains the observation of 1000 stars in the same non empty measured space; at my location 1000 PMTM models of stars are large enough to be observed. The line is drawn across the PMTM observation in the same space. This sort of uline, measuring stars with the ruler, helps to idenitfy the time data observable depth of the universe at location, with or without mass.
  • This observable time depth for the universe can be done in open space, where 1P1 applies without a mirror among multiple points, or in a closed space like a mirror minary container.
  • The uLine is used to identify the construction of the RULE.
  • The uLine is observable in natural space or a container just about anywhere in the universe.
OPO Extensible; How understand the for the Point Binary Container.
  • This Point binary Container (Term is MB, mirror binary) is displayed as a certain equation.
  • The uline is observable here inside a mirror binary container, but can also be observed part of star charts of some orderly evaluation for sequential points on a straight or other line.
  • http://interstellar.governmentofarch.net/ is a star chart demonstrated orderly stellar observation according to a 3d calculation observable.
  • This point binary container is used to understand the RULE.
  • This Point binary container helped me discover the uLINE.
  • At least 1 PMTM model is applied for each star, and a central RULEr observation or point location relative two is identified with V over T. The RULER gave Order to the Universe as that observation of a scientist. :)
  • The 0 indicates no energy beyond this mirror marker point (specifically indicated mirror, where no indication is a distance comaprable a ruler to actual measurement, the reflections at distance inside the mirror binary container contain no energy that is not contained in the chamber. The use of 1, indicates the energy is permeable the measurement or container. The univsere observaion among stars, is not a mirror binary observation, 1|p|1 would apply, and where P is also my poision of measurement among those other measured in open space.

These are talked about at anARK.net



Modular

Modular Contributions operate because the basic model enables that action. A perspective for an extensible application Has the assembled model, and some observation of gravity produced or understood. The Scientist make a rock or tray float. While showing this is true, and because of this factor of the model, I enable this to float. The science of the float is a module and might be called "anti gravity" and is validated against unchanging or hard to change factors of the environment understood with model. Where I can make the small rock float across the room, I can not easily change those attributes of gravity in the area. The ToR model, and the anti gravity "modular Application," identified the science of one and the other, and stated is that one can function without the other, but one can not function without the other.


Validating an Modular

Scientist A come to me and says behold, my equation for the quantum physics and/or basic sciences alleges their are 11 dimensions and I an travel among the dimensions with this concept for a door! The model is compared to the scientists claims, where one model looks like the universe almost as precisely as we can use it, the other is validated as to whether it looks anything like the universe or not. The example, the model used by our ToR is shaped just like you see mass in the universe, and a scientist (not specific to 11 dimensions, it was used to make statement of a physical dimensions compared against physical dimensions) attempts to fit the equation for a square into the hole of an equation for a circle alleging he can build a doorway to another dimension. There is or is not a match stated for this descriptor, the presentation is or is not possible. And across the extensible or modular approaches, either additions or subtractions the result of hardware or innovation would validate a function.


Validating a Modular or as Natural Phenomena

For this process, the model is applied for field sciences. Some descriptors of early work, not so correct are displayed to make the argument for natural process. Here, I discern what is neither a modular or extensible approach, but the natural of the model. Across the uline observation and RULE, I have included another attribute of the PMTM mass, and the argue two functions that are attraction and repulsion.

This "Description" uses a simple proton gun to observe a magnetic field, as part of the PMTM dynamic. I apply a second magnet, and then proceed to describe it as natural function, modular, or extensible.

Quiz: Is the addition of the second magnet modular, or Natural function? Does changing the polar orientation of the magnet make it a modular application?


Modular (TOR) Marley's Ruler

Earth Model Solar Model Local Star Group Model Larger Star Group Model and Galaxy


Ask Questions, contribute, and read about plans
for continued development from 2018 through 2022.








Learn more from QuanTunnel
Learn more from Government of anArc




Activity 1986-2018+. Copyright Michael Marley 2012-2018+.
To request documentation or analysis, contact@governmentfanarch.com.
All rights reserved. MarleyLABS.com an QuanTunnel.com.
Copyright Michael Marley 2012-2018+.